Re-drafted around the discipline that builds clinical trust: show the inside of the body (real MRI scan visuals in the hero), name the consultants (Dr. Lim, Dr. Balachandran, Dr. Tan with full credentials), display the regulators (Act 586, MDA, FDA/CE, MSQH), and be honest about the evidence (a "what we claim · what we don't · what the literature says" triangle on every page).
Real anatomical visualisation, not abstract orbs. Sagittal head, ventricles, cerebellum, annotated.
Dr. Lim, Dr. Balachandran, Dr. Tan — full MBBS / MMed / FRCR credentials, fellowships, sub-specialties.
Act 586 · MDA · FDA/CE · MSQH — visible immediately, not hidden in the footer.
An actual specimen report with hand-bound styling. What guests literally receive on the day.
"What we claim · what we don't · what the literature says" — engages the ACR/CAR debate openly.
Both panels apply across v0.1, v0.2, and v0.3 — the underlying business strategy doesn't change with the visual treatment.
30+ competitors across 4 categories: direct B2C MRI clinics, Singapore hospital screening, Malaysia hospitals, longevity retreats. Includes online sentiment, the Prenuvo lawsuit (Jan 2026), market sizing, RTS Link, clinical-evidence debate.
Open the research panel8 pricing models analysed. 4 detailed personas (Singapore HNW, Indonesian HNW, Malaysian Affluent, C-Suite). Willingness-to-pay analysis vs. Singapore hospital ceiling and US disruptor floor. Switching costs.
Open the pricing panelThe earlier draft directions remain accessible. The v0.3 styles above are the current proposals.